<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Three Years: Emerging National ICT Agendas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/</link>
	<description>Torquay 2006</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Morgan</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Wales has a lot to offer and celebrate and it was disappointing that throughout the discussion Wales was not mentioned and there was no Welsh representative on the panel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wales has a lot to offer and celebrate and it was disappointing that throughout the discussion Wales was not mentioned and there was no Welsh representative on the panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Berry</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 09:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I really wish I was in Torquay for the conference, but this is almost as good! Gareth - you're providing an excellent service here; it's so useful to be able to follow at least some of what's going on. 
Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish I was in Torquay for the conference, but this is almost as good! Gareth - you&#8217;re providing an excellent service here; it&#8217;s so useful to be able to follow at least some of what&#8217;s going on.<br />
Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ford in Torquay &#187; Its almost like being there&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ford in Torquay &#187; Its almost like being there&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m still at home in Nottingham before I begin the trek down to Torquay but I feel like I am already there. I can look at the photos posted already to the conference photo blog. Gareth has been blogging the &#8216;The Next Three Years - Emerging ICT Agendas&#8216; Check out the really interesting sound-bytes in the comments. Doug Brown - DFES We have 23,000 flowers blooming, some not as bright as other. Whe we see good practice we should say to the others, wake up. We should disseminate that. Thereâ€™s lots of good practice. Part of out problem is that we are not top-down enough. What we are trying to do is to provide leaderhip. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m still at home in Nottingham before I begin the trek down to Torquay but I feel like I am already there. I can look at the photos posted already to the conference photo blog. Gareth has been blogging the &#8216;The Next Three Years - Emerging ICT Agendas&#8216; Check out the really interesting sound-bytes in the comments. Doug Brown - DFES We have 23,000 flowers blooming, some not as bright as other. Whe we see good practice we should say to the others, wake up. We should disseminate that. Thereâ€™s lots of good practice. Part of out problem is that we are not top-down enough. What we are trying to do is to provide leaderhip. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Davies</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Is there anything that Naace should be doing?

Laurie - Naace must stay at getting the right end of the stick. It is about being the learning organisation.

Doug - totally agree with Laurie. you must be very clear that it is a learning agenda. I want to challenge Naace to say what is exemplar practice? It's getting global. "Education services can be our biggest export", Gordon Brown talking of the economy.

John - You can test everything by asking whether Naace is modelling the model? Naace might model peer-review as a suggestion. To develop a methodology for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anything that Naace should be doing?</p>
<p>Laurie - Naace must stay at getting the right end of the stick. It is about being the learning organisation.</p>
<p>Doug - totally agree with Laurie. you must be very clear that it is a learning agenda. I want to challenge Naace to say what is exemplar practice? It&#8217;s getting global. &#8220;Education services can be our biggest export&#8221;, Gordon Brown talking of the economy.</p>
<p>John - You can test everything by asking whether Naace is modelling the model? Naace might model peer-review as a suggestion. To develop a methodology for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Davies</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Ian for Buckenhamshire - We are shortly to receive money for learning platform, should we aggregate on CPD or the platform?


Doug - we do not spend enough on CPD. Some real challenges as a whole. The issue is about CPD for ICT, but for learning. Schools need to be aware that they have money for CPD - revenue and capital pot. If you look at the documents and do all the maths, you can work out how much the ICT element is, but schools must decide the priorities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian for Buckenhamshire - We are shortly to receive money for learning platform, should we aggregate on CPD or the platform?</p>
<p>Doug - we do not spend enough on CPD. Some real challenges as a whole. The issue is about CPD for ICT, but for learning. Schools need to be aware that they have money for CPD - revenue and capital pot. If you look at the documents and do all the maths, you can work out how much the ICT element is, but schools must decide the priorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Davies</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Learning Platforms for younger children, how might we do this?

Doug - we do have some around the country. There are bits, the issue is not at year 5 that a pupil has an e-portfolio for ever, but an opportunity to allow pupils to reflect on their practice and learning. This has to be appropriate. It might be just a space to save their work on the network.

John - You must apply the same principles to those of older pupils, but in the right context.

Laurie - a space to draw together work.

Should we define an entitlement for children in ICT?

Laurie - probably opposed. It is likely to become a ticklist. A better approach is to look at higher level outcomes - responsible citizens, etc etc. Don't start with the technology.

Doug - agree, this is about learning not ICT. There should be a learning entitlement.

John - happy with that, we need to debate how we get rid of barriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learning Platforms for younger children, how might we do this?</p>
<p>Doug - we do have some around the country. There are bits, the issue is not at year 5 that a pupil has an e-portfolio for ever, but an opportunity to allow pupils to reflect on their practice and learning. This has to be appropriate. It might be just a space to save their work on the network.</p>
<p>John - You must apply the same principles to those of older pupils, but in the right context.</p>
<p>Laurie - a space to draw together work.</p>
<p>Should we define an entitlement for children in ICT?</p>
<p>Laurie - probably opposed. It is likely to become a ticklist. A better approach is to look at higher level outcomes - responsible citizens, etc etc. Don&#8217;t start with the technology.</p>
<p>Doug - agree, this is about learning not ICT. There should be a learning entitlement.</p>
<p>John - happy with that, we need to debate how we get rid of barriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Davies</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Brian Durrant - in the mission of transforming teaching and learning, we must understand the necessary and sufficient conditions needed - the environment etc. The most difficult is changing teachers. My observation is the best way is through other people. The most effective thing we have done in London is to put people in the field. Two points, itn't it ironic that we are reducing the number of people in LAs, second point is that LAs are being undermined by school autonomy when they are best placed to aggregate?

John - these people who influence teachers are teachers. So how do we do that? 

Laurie - i refer to my previous point on 'master-class'. Key thing in changing teachers but they will only change given the right circumstances. Create the conditions so that teachers can be change-agents. It's not the teachers its the structures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Durrant - in the mission of transforming teaching and learning, we must understand the necessary and sufficient conditions needed - the environment etc. The most difficult is changing teachers. My observation is the best way is through other people. The most effective thing we have done in London is to put people in the field. Two points, itn&#8217;t it ironic that we are reducing the number of people in LAs, second point is that LAs are being undermined by school autonomy when they are best placed to aggregate?</p>
<p>John - these people who influence teachers are teachers. So how do we do that? </p>
<p>Laurie - i refer to my previous point on &#8216;master-class&#8217;. Key thing in changing teachers but they will only change given the right circumstances. Create the conditions so that teachers can be change-agents. It&#8217;s not the teachers its the structures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Davies</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>What do the panel expect to see in a school that has implemented personalised learning?

Doug - we are now in a position where the technology can make learning personalised.

Children must have personal learning experiences - Challenge in the technology is that we are not really understand what that means, and producing the software that help the tayloring that experience. Material needs to do more than address the content, assessment etc. Teachers give personal response to moments in learning, ICT needs to take the barriers away to enable personalisation. Some schools have created models of support for parents at home to support their children.

John - expect to see young people to exercise meaningful and worthwhile choices. We need to get rid of the barriers that stop children using the technology.

Laurie - Learners at the centre, then focus on the outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the panel expect to see in a school that has implemented personalised learning?</p>
<p>Doug - we are now in a position where the technology can make learning personalised.</p>
<p>Children must have personal learning experiences - Challenge in the technology is that we are not really understand what that means, and producing the software that help the tayloring that experience. Material needs to do more than address the content, assessment etc. Teachers give personal response to moments in learning, ICT needs to take the barriers away to enable personalisation. Some schools have created models of support for parents at home to support their children.</p>
<p>John - expect to see young people to exercise meaningful and worthwhile choices. We need to get rid of the barriers that stop children using the technology.</p>
<p>Laurie - Learners at the centre, then focus on the outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Davies</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Leon Cych - talking aobut a top down model, but only just touched on a bottom up structure. The fear is we would be all VLE'd up and no one will use it. How far have you considered this?

Laurie - important point. There is a central role to facilitate implementation. Every pupil has the right to a teacher who is confident. We have implemented the concept of 'master-class'. Our master-classers support teachers in adopting new technologies and approaches. The local circumstance dictates the priority.

Doug - totally refute that. We have 23,000 flowers blooming, some not as bright as other. Whe we see good practice we should say to the others, wake up. We should disseminate that. There's lots of good practice. Part of out problem is that we are not top-down enough. What we are trying to do is to provide leaderhip.

John - Top down and bottom is not the right phrase, embedding is more important. There is a lot to be done at every level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon Cych - talking aobut a top down model, but only just touched on a bottom up structure. The fear is we would be all VLE&#8217;d up and no one will use it. How far have you considered this?</p>
<p>Laurie - important point. There is a central role to facilitate implementation. Every pupil has the right to a teacher who is confident. We have implemented the concept of &#8216;master-class&#8217;. Our master-classers support teachers in adopting new technologies and approaches. The local circumstance dictates the priority.</p>
<p>Doug - totally refute that. We have 23,000 flowers blooming, some not as bright as other. Whe we see good practice we should say to the others, wake up. We should disseminate that. There&#8217;s lots of good practice. Part of out problem is that we are not top-down enough. What we are trying to do is to provide leaderhip.</p>
<p>John - Top down and bottom is not the right phrase, embedding is more important. There is a lot to be done at every level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Davies</title>
		<link>http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conference.naaceblogs.org/2006/02/28/the-next-three-years-emerging-national-ict-agendas/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>John - not a question of managed service against local choice. There is now maturity in this discussion. People have begun to realise that it is not a dogma debate. It's a debate about when it makes sense. You only need to get one 40th of aggregation in GB, to get the value for money that NI has got.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John - not a question of managed service against local choice. There is now maturity in this discussion. People have begun to realise that it is not a dogma debate. It&#8217;s a debate about when it makes sense. You only need to get one 40th of aggregation in GB, to get the value for money that NI has got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
