What was said in this session:
Pupils and staff from the Cornwallis School and Hugh Christie
Hugh Christie Technology College - Anything is possible
A 1170 non selective school with 1:1 ratio, many being Tablet PCs.
Would a teacher of yesterday recognise our classrooms of today?
We would like to think that the answer to this is no. We have created different learning spaces of different sizes. The ICT is in classroom and in the hands of pupils and teachers.
Our objectives:
- Personalising learning
- Creative learing
- Integrated learning
Power of personalisation, example, PDAs in Year 10 Geography. The PDA is ideal tool. Jamie said:
Power of Creativity example, using Flash. Easy to make simple animations. Pupils can create animations to illustrate concepts. Teachers find it easy as well.
Power of Integration, example, Tablet PCs.
Research and Development
We’ve set up an ‘ICT champions team’ to help staff develop competencies. They run sessions for other teachers.
We also have feeder schools coming to our schools, and community projects.
We have to do more with less resources.
The lonely artisan problem - the teacher in individual classroom. A distinctive problem. They need to work together.
Some solutions:
- work on as many agendas as possible at the same time
- make it simple
- make it fast
- don’t worry about confusion
- chaos is normal
A series of 100 day plans.
Shift the budget away
Invest in technology, aim for 1:1 access
Development of a common curriculum
Develop a common communications model
Focus on teaching and learning with use of project based learning; teacher and coach model
Use of external Ofsted inspection teams
Assessment of learning every 7 weeks
Change the staff culture e-scripting
Relationship driven environment
Key Performance indicators
re-branding exercise
sell the idea of education - make it cool
data mining leads to new sub groups
offender profiling identifies those at risk
Chris Gerry’s address was so rapid it was almost impossible to take it all in but I found it the most encouraging of the whole conference.
Here at last was someone who was prepared to question some of the ‘givens’ of English education that turn out not to be cast in concrete after all.
I’m so sick of hearing Heads complain that their budget is too constrained to allow then to do X or Y when Chris showed that he can go for 1:1 computer ratios from his core funding - but only if he questions radically all the holy cows that others won’t look at.
This should be compulsory fare for all involved in BSF.